Open Letter to CNN International
May 18, 2010 by Guest Columnist
Filed under Blogs
Open Letter from a Bangkok resident: Recently, CNN Thailand Correspondents Dan Rivers and Sarah Snider have made me seriously reconsider your agency as a source for reliable and accurate unbiased news. As of this writing, over thousands of CNN’s viewers have already begun to question the accuracy and dependability of its reporting as regards events in Afghanistan, Haiti, Iraq, Iran, etc., in addition to Bangkok.
As a first-rate global news agency, CNN has an inherent professional duty to deliver all sides of the truth to the global public who have faithfully and sincerely placed their trust and reliance in you. Your news network, by its longtime transnational presence and extensive reach, has been put in a position of trust and care; CNN’s journalists, reporters, and researchers have a collective responsibility to follow the journalist’s code and ethics to deliver and present facts from all facets of the story, not merely one-sided, shallow and sensational half-truths. The magnitude of harm or potential extent of damage that erroneous and fallacious news reporting can cause to (and exacerbate), not only a country’s internal state of affairs, economic well-being, and general international perception, but also the real lives and livelihood of the innocent and voiceless people of that nation, is enormous. CNN should not negligently discard its duty of care to the international populace by reporting single-sided or unverified facts and distorted truths drawn from superficial research, or display/distribute biased images which capture only one side of the actual event.
Mr Rivers and Ms Snider have NOT done their best under these life-threatening circumstances because many other foreign correspondents have done better. All of Mr Rivers and Ms Sniders’ quotes and statements seem to have been solely taken from the anti-government protest leaders or their followers/sympathizers. Yet, all details about the government’s position have come from secondary resources. No direct interviews with government officials have been shown; no interviews or witness statements from ordinary Bangkok residents or civilians unaffiliated with the protesters, particularly those who have been harassed by or suffered at the hands of the protesters, have been circulated.
Why the discrepancy in source of information? Why the failure to report all of the government’s previous numerous attempts to negotiate or invitations for protesters to go home? Why no broadcasts shown of the myriad ways the red protesters have terrorized and harmed innocent civilians by burning their shops, enclosing burning tyres around apartment buildings, shooting glass marbles at civilians from high altitudes, attacking civilians in their cars, and worst of all, obstructing paramedics and ambulances carrying civilians injured by M79 grenade blasts during the Silom incident of April 24, 2010, thereby resulting in the sole civilian casualty? The entire timeline of events that have forced the government to take this difficult stance has been hugely and callously ignored in deference to the red ‘underdogs’.
Mr Rivers and Ms Snider’s choice of sensational vocabulary and terminology in every newscast or news report, and choice of images to broadcast, has resulted in law-abiding soldiers and the heavily-pressured Thai government being painted in a negative, harsh, and oppressive light, whereas the genuinely violent and law-breaking arm of the anti-government protesters – who are directly responsible for overt acts of aggression not only against armed soldiers but also against helpless, unarmed civilians and law-abiding apolitical residents of this once blooming metropolis (and whose actions under American law would by now be classified as terrorist activities) – are portrayed as righteous freedom fighters deserving of worldwide sympathy and support. This has mislead the various international Human Rights watchdogs to believe the Thai government are sending trigger-happy soldiers out to ruthlessly murder unarmed civilians without just cause.
As a current resident of “war zone” Bangkok who has experienced the effect of the Red protests first hand and is living in a state of constant terror and anxiety as to whether her family, friends, and home would get bombed or attacked by the hardcore anti-government vigilantes/paramilitary forces – I appeal to CNN’s professional integrity to critically investigate and scrutinize the misinformed news reporting of your above-named correspondents. If they are incapable of obtaining genuine, authentic facts from any other source except the Red Protest leaders and red-sympathizing Thai translators or acquaintances, or from fellow non-Thai-speaking journalists who are similarly ignorant of Thai language, culture, history, and society, then perhaps CNN should consider reassigning field correspondents to Thailand.
I implore and urge you to please take serious action to correct or reverse the grave injustice that has been done to the Thai nation, her government, and the majority of law-abiding Thai citizens and expatriate residents by having endorsed and widely circulated poorly researched and misrepresented news coverage of the current ongoing political unrest and escalating violence in Thailand.
Copies of this open letter have also been distributed to other local as well as international news media and social networks for public information. Please feel free to contact me further should you require any additional concrete and reputable evidence in substantiation and corroboration of my complaints and claims stated hereinabove.
Napas Na Pombejra, B.A., LL.B. (Lond.)
Bangkok, Thailand
May 17, 2010
http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=277701868
Addendum
Enclosed herewith for your attention and information some examples of other quality international news bulletins by respectable foreign journalists so you may assess at your leisure the sub-par quality and misleading nature of Mr Rivers and Ms Sniders’ journalism:
1. New York Times: http://www.nytimes.com/2010/05/16/wo…ia/16thai.html
2. Fox News/Associated Press:
(i) http://www.foxnews.com/world/2010/05…ckdown-killed/
(ii) http://www.foxnews.com/world/2010/05…aos-continues/
3. Global Post: http://www.globalpost.com/dispatch/t…otests-bangkok
4. NHK: NHK WORLD English
5. Al Jazeera: Al Jazeera English – AJE
6. Deutsche Welle (English media in Germany):
Unrest in Thailand escalates | Asia | Deutsche Welle | 14.05.2010
7. Local English daily newspaper’s chronology of events on Day 3 of “War in Bangkok”:
What went down – Nationmultimedia.com










Dear K. Napas,
I sincerely thank you for speaking up for the majority of Thai people who may not be aware of the biased CNN news reporters. I have travelled aborad recently in April and May 2010. I listened to CNN news and could not help feeling that the news is one-sided – only direct interview from “red shirt”. Not once from Bangkok residents.
To CNN,
Your news reporters are biased and unprfessional. It is understandable for persons to take side but this should not be for a media like CNN.
Pedro @ May 21, 2010 at 9:35 am
I don’t know how often you take out insurance or read insurance policies but all insurance policies I have ever come acros exclude liability arising from acts of terrorism and war.
No one in Bangkok is getting insurance payout.
Your contention that a juvenile reporter has been “mislead [ing] the various international Human Rights watchdogs” and duping them into believing things (what things?) is bizarre, if amusing.
How do you know the grenades were M79s? Did you see them – and if so, perhaps know who fired them? Would you know the difference between an M79 and (say) an M203? Were they perhaps a Thai-specific M150? Or did you just read it in a news report?
If indeed there is a “grave injustice that has been done to the Thai nation”, was it really done by CNN or by Thais – either rioting and setting fire to stuff or sitting in posh uniforms doing nothing about it for weeks on end?
Lastly, one of your seven quoted “quality international news bulletins by respectable foreign journalists” turns out to be “The Nation”. Now I think we may be sure you are, as we nasty foreigners say, having a laugh………….
I agree with this letter, but there is something similar to this open letter happening to Thai’s reporter. Since, most of the picture that can be used to show the crucial of thai government only found on CNN, but not in the Thai’s newsapaper, television, and radio.
So, what happen to reporters in Thailand? Are they really capable to say the truth from “BOTH” side.
I agree with K.Aunchalee. Reporter should consider carefully, especially news that involve with emotion of local. What the truth is, they should get information from different sources and avoid presenting a bias.
I wonder when the international media you all crave so much will question who really set fire to Central World and Siam Theatre and WHY? Some fires were probably caused by the reds but some places were properly torched. Is anyone else out there wondering if these might be insurance scams?
Local media has accepted it all without investigation or question. Central World was not a succesful shopping centre and Siam Theatre had a lot of people against its demolition – before it was burned down that is.
All very fishy to me and far too easy to blame the reds. Lucky Siam Paragon, Central Chidlom and the other more successful malls were not damaged.
@Pierre, I would like to question you with ‘What rights do you have commenting on our country’s standard?’. Yes, we are just a ‘developing country’, not a developED country. We have our own way of managing our people. I admit that we may not have a great way of doing so, but sorry everything in our country belongs to us. We did not get it from any other countries. We never take anyone properties to be ours.
@everyone, If you have any curiosity about how do we feel about the situation in TH, please ask local. Ask those who live their life normally and praying for peace. Not red, not yellow, not ‘no color’ shirts. None of us like what is going on right now. No one really protested for ‘pure democratic’. They are all protesting for one’s benefit. And please, if you don’t know ‘in depth’ detail, do not make any suggestion or any judgment. Because it may create conflict and misunderstanding between countries.
I would like to confirm and stand on my feet that we are ‘land of smile’ and it will never change. Although we have internal conflict, local like me, like my friends are willing to help every THAI….to bring back our land, our people, our smiles….to our KING!!!!!
I’ve been ‘asking local’ for years – never got anything like an honest reply. Pierre, or anyone else living here and forking out taxes to your government, has every right to comment, citicise and condemn.
After all – and this might be (er…) Central to the whole issue – if “none of us like what is going on right now”, why is it going on?
you evil HA_HA
K. HA_HA
As I’d read your comment, Im sure you are also a Thais. A big red one, too. I presume.
You said you want to see the country liberalize & freed of dictatorship but why are you speaking like one? You are telling the world that we shouldn’t listen to the voice of a 20 years old who played games on facebook? Who are you to judge?
Personally, Im just really sick & tired of the ” HYPOCTITE ” who kept prancing on words like double standard & dictatorship. I am not a government supporter nor a red/yellow shirt. I think for myself & I love his majesty the KING.
I agree with this letter and thank you so much to speak up for Thai people. ( Alot of them can not speak and understand english that is why they can not let the world know and understand the truth )